Suspect wrong then....
The point...that you entirely missed...is that when a person writes something about a disagreement with an ex over a child, you are very probably looking at only the tip of an iceberg.
Divorces can and often do bring out the worst in people. This WORST can also carry over long beyond the court settlement.
This is what happened to my friend. His ex was having second thoughts about their breakup...even though they had been divorced for over 2 years. He had moved on. He had a new girlfriend. They were living together. She had kids...they were thinking about marriage.
He had an ex-girlfriend as well. All AFTER the divorce. He does NOT play around when married.
The ex-wife approached the ex-girlfriend about revenge on him. The ex-girlfriend thought she was joking...until it all started. Her testimony was one of the ones that the prosecutors tried to suppress.
The child he was supposed to have mollested had been denied visitation rights with him for over a year. Prior to that, his visitation with the child had been 100% supervised with either the mother or other family members...and the ONLY one that would NOT testify to that in court was the mother (the ex)...even though there were witnesses.
The child's testimony was in words way beyond the age level of the child and NOT in the child's normal speech. The independent psychologist was willing to testify that there was obvious coaching and that the incidents were most likely NOT true. The ex's story changed and she began to include the current and former girlfriend in what was described to the court as an adult and children orgy. ALL proven false.
But...the ex's accusations were taken seriously and he was sent through the legal system over and over (there was even a problem in that his attorney (a female) had come up against the prosecutor (a female) several times and had won every time...so the prosecutor had an ax to grind there...and things did NOT free up until the case was transferred to a different prosecutor.
And what might you ask does all of this have to do with the motorcycle question?
Well, if an ex can go out for blood and go as far as that one did on NO foundation, what can happen with a pissed off ex who can make a case (no matter how slight) with some merit?
Father's have very limited rights in child custody situations. That is NOT how it is supposed to be but is how it is.
As a previous post stated "Pick your battles..." This is one I would NOT recommend.
Now, why is it that anyone that disagrees with someone gets labelled a TROLL.
Suspect all you want...I could care less.
|